\relax 
\citation{Haffner2004}
\citation{Steffen2006}
\citation{Stevenson2006}
\citation{James2001}
\citation{James2001}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {4}QST with MUBs}{124}}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.1}Introduction}{124}}
\citation{James2001}
\citation{James2001}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4.1}{\ignorespaces The tomographic projectors used by James et al\cite  {James2001}. Sixteen combinations of Pauli operators were chosen out of the 36 possible combinations, resulting in better estimation of $\sigma _z\otimes \sigma _z$ outcomes than, for instance, $\sigma _y\otimes \sigma _y$.}}{126}}
\newlabel{tab:James_measurements}{{4.1}{126}}
\citation{Altepeter2005}
\citation{Leonhardt1996}
\citation{Renes2004}
\citation{Massar1995}
\citation{Ling2006}
\citation{Ling2008}
\citation{Jozsa1994}
\citation{Audenaert2007}
\citation{MikeandIke}
\citation{deBurgh2008}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.2}Comparing different tomography strategies}{128}}
\citation{deBurgh2008}
\citation{MikeandIke}
\citation{MikeandIke}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.3}Convergence of the estimate towards the true density matrix}{129}}
\newlabel{convergence}{{4.3}{129}}
\newlabel{eq:mixed_state_fidelity}{{4.18}{131}}
\newlabel{fig:pure_state_estimation}{{4.1(a)}{132}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:pure_state_estimation}{{(a)}{132}}
\newlabel{fig:mixed_state_estimation}{{4.1(b)}{132}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:mixed_state_estimation}{{(b)}{132}}
\newlabel{fig:dependence_on_N}{{4.3}{132}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {Dependence of the infidelity on $N$ for the pure quantum state $\mathinner {|{HH}\delimiter "526930B }$. The scaling goes roughly as $1/\sqrt {N}$.}}}{132}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Dependence of the infidelity on $N$ for the maximally-mixed state $\frac {1}{4}\mathbb {I}_4$. The scaling goes as $1/N$.}}}{132}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.4}The choice of measurement bases}{133}}
\newlabel{analytic_infidelity}{{4.4}{133}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.1}{\ignorespaces Plot of the Hilbert-Schmidt overlap of the projectors in standard separable state tomography.}}{134}}
\newlabel{fig:SSQST_overlaps}{{4.1}{134}}
\citation{Wootters1989}
\citation{Vianna2008}
\newlabel{definition_mutual_unbiasedness}{{4.20}{135}}
\newlabel{eq:error_calc}{{4.21}{136}}
\newlabel{eq:statistical_independence}{{4.22}{136}}
\citation{Lawrence2002}
\newlabel{eq:infidelity_ratio}{{4.26}{137}}
\citation{Lawrence2002}
\citation{Lawrence2002}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4.2}{\ignorespaces The construction of mutually-unbiased bases according to the method of \cite  {Lawrence2002}. The states making up mutually-unbiased bases for two qubits are the eigenstates of sets of three mutually commuting Pauli operators.}}{138}}
\newlabel{tab:mubs_eigenops}{{4.2}{138}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.5}Constructing MUBs for two qubits}{138}}
\citation{MikeandIke}
\citation{James2001}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.6}Experiment}{139}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.6.1}Separable measurements}{139}}
\newlabel{fig:separable_apparatus}{{4.2(a)}{141}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:separable_apparatus}{{(a)}{141}}
\newlabel{fig:entangled_apparatus}{{4.2(b)}{141}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:entangled_apparatus}{{(b)}{141}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {Apparatus for measuring separable state projections}}}{141}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Apparatus for entangled state projections}}}{141}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.6.2}MUBs measurements}{141}}
\citation{Schuck2006}
\citation{Klimov2008}
\newlabel{eq:projection_op}{{4.27}{143}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.6.3}Analysis}{144}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.6.4}Results}{144}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.2}{\ignorespaces Measured infidelity for $\mathinner {|{HV}\delimiter "526930B }$}}{145}}
\newlabel{fig:HV}{{4.2}{145}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.3}{\ignorespaces Measured infidelity for the maximally-mixed state}}{146}}
\newlabel{fig:maximally_mixed}{{4.3}{146}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.4}{\ignorespaces Measured infidelity for the partially mixed entangled state close to $\frac  {1}{\sqrt  {2}}\left (\mathinner {|{HH}\delimiter "526930B }+\mathinner {|{VV}\delimiter "526930B }\right )$}}{147}}
\newlabel{fig:entangled_state}{{4.4}{147}}
\citation{Leonhardt1996}
\citation{Gibbons2004}
\citation{Gibbons2004}
\citation{Gibbons2004}
\citation{Gibbons2004}
\citation{Gibbons2004}
\citation{Gibbons2004}
\citation{Gibbons2004}
\citation{Gibbons2004}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.7}The discrete Wigner function for two qubits}{148}}
\newlabel{section_wigner}{{4.7}{148}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.7.1}Finite fields}{149}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4.3}{\ignorespaces Addition table for $\mathbb  {F}_4$. Reproduced from reference \cite  {Gibbons2004}.}}{149}}
\newlabel{tab:addition_table}{{4.3}{149}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4.4}{\ignorespaces Multiplication table for $\mathbb  {F}_4$. Reproduced from reference \cite  {Gibbons2004}.}}{149}}
\newlabel{tab:multiplication_table}{{4.4}{149}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.5}{\ignorespaces The five sets of four parallel lines in the $\mathbb  {F}_4 \times \mathbb  {F}_4$ phase space. Reproduced from reference \cite  {Gibbons2004}.}}{150}}
\newlabel{fig:phase_space_lines}{{4.5}{150}}
\citation{Wigner1932}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.7.2}Discrete Wigner functions}{151}}
\newlabel{eq:completeness}{{4.31}{151}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4.5}{\ignorespaces Table of measured expectation values from MUBs tomography on an entangled state}}{152}}
\newlabel{tab:expectation_value_table}{{4.5}{152}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.7.3}Reconstruction}{152}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4.8}Summary}{153}}
\@setckpt{chapter4}{
\setcounter{page}{155}
\setcounter{equation}{32}
\setcounter{enumi}{3}
\setcounter{enumii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiv}{132}
\setcounter{footnote}{4}
\setcounter{mpfootnote}{0}
\setcounter{part}{0}
\setcounter{chapter}{4}
\setcounter{section}{8}
\setcounter{subsection}{0}
\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}
\setcounter{paragraph}{0}
\setcounter{subparagraph}{0}
\setcounter{figure}{5}
\setcounter{table}{5}
\setcounter{parentequation}{0}
\setcounter{subfigure}{0}
\setcounter{lofdepth}{1}
\setcounter{subtable}{0}
\setcounter{lotdepth}{1}
}
